Date: 10 September 2025
Purpose: Extend analysis of the Spending Review 2025
and Strategic Defence Review 2025 by evaluating the Defence Industrial Strategy
(DIS) 2025 – Making Defence an Engine for Growth, with emphasis on training,
simulation and alignment with the IMPACT framework.
Related Notes:
Briefing Note: Spending Review 2025 – Training and
Simulation (Metier Solutions Blog, June 2025)
Briefing Note: Strategic Defence Review 2025 – Training and
Simulation (Metier Solutions Blog, June 2025)
Context
SR 2025 established budgetary uplifts, confirming
defence spending rise to 2.5% GDP by 2027, with allocations supporting training
and simulation infrastructure.
SDR 2025 set doctrinal priorities: NATO-centred
pedagogy, managed risk, synthetic environments and compressed delivery
timelines (Nov 2025–Dec 2026).
DIS 2025 reframes defence as both a security
requirement and an industrial growth engine, embedding training and simulation
reform into economic policy, procurement strategy and regional investment.
Strategic Vision (DIS 2025)
Six priority outcomes by 2035:
- Make defence an engine for growth.
- Back UK-based businesses, including SMEs.
- Lead in defence innovation.
- Build a resilient industrial base.
- Transform procurement.
- Forge enduring partnerships.
Training & Simulation Implications
Skills Infrastructure: Creation of Defence Technical
Excellence Colleges (DTECs), Defence Universities Alliance, Defence Skills
Passport and the Destination Defence campaign.
Synthetic Environments: Integration of AI, digital
twins, nuclear enterprise simulation and rapid commercial exploitation.
Procurement Reform: Segmented acquisition model
reduces timelines, accelerating adoption of training and simulation
technologies.
Regional Delivery: Defence Growth Deals (Plymouth,
South Yorkshire, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland) anchor simulation
capabilities within industrial clusters.
Integration with SR and SDR
Continuity: DIS operationalises SDR’s doctrinal
intent (synthetic wraps, career education pathways) by embedding them into
funding and industrial levers.
Evolution: DIS positions training and simulation not
only for readiness but also as economic multipliers (skills, exports, inward
investment).
Time Horizon: SDR compressed milestones (2025–26) sit
uneasily against DIS’s 10-year investment horizon, creating sequencing risks.
Challenges (Mapped to IMPACT Coefficients)
Key Risks & Mitigations
Synchronisation risk: SDR deadlines vs DIS
sequencing.
Mitigation: Accelerate synthetic environment pilots within
SDR window.
Industrial imbalance: SMEs excluded early.
Mitigation: Interim SME engagement measures before 2026.
Cultural barriers: Workforce mobility resisted.
Mitigation: Embed Skills Passport into cadet and induction
pipelines.
DIS 2025 deepens the reforms outlined in SR and SDR,
embedding training and simulation into industrial strategy, procurement and
skills development. Yet timeliness, capacity and resilience remain
exposed. Addressing these challenges through #IMPACT provides the necessary
diagnostic and mitigation framework.
Comments
Post a Comment