Skip to main content

Barriers and Blockers to Organizational Performance, An Expert and Academic Perspectives

 

Industry experts and academics have long studied these challenges, offering insight into why organizations struggle with performance measurement. Kaplan and Norton, creators of the Balanced Scorecard, noted that companies often fail to balance their metrics, overemphasizing financial indicators at the expense of other strategic areas (customers, processes, learning). This imbalance can make the performance measurement system less relevant and lead to its abandonment. Academic research by Bourne et al. found that many performance measurement initiatives fail due to partial approaches, companies implement measures without integrating them into management processes or they lack change management to support the new system [9] [6]. The “political” aspect is also emphasized, internal politics can derail measurement (for instance, when certain metrics threaten a powerful department’s image) Neely and Bourne (2000) identified three root causes for implementation failure: political resistance, inadequate infrastructure and lack of focus in the measurement system [6]. These correspond closely to the cultural, structural and strategic issues discussed above.

Performance management consultants like Stacey Barr and Mark Hocknell underscore the behavioural change required to make measurement work. Barr points out that organizations need a step-by-step methodology and to start small to overcome the “pain of change” in adopting metrics. Without a clear method, people flounder with basic tasks like defining a good KPI or getting buy-in for targets [8]. Hocknell similarly observes that many teams prefer “inaccurate good news” to “accurate bad news,” indicating a culture that shoots the messenger and thus resists honest measurement [10]. Both experts advocate creating a safe, learning-focused environment for measurement. The literature also suggests involving employees in designing metrics to increase buy in, lack of employee involvement is a noted barrier that can make measures feel imposed and irrelevant. When people at all levels participate in defining what success looks like, they are more likely to value the metrics and use them.

Table: Key Barriers to Organizational Performance Measurement and Examples (from multiple sources [2] [7] 

The table summarizes the major categories of barriers identified by experts and research. In practice, these factors often overlap for example, a blame-oriented culture (cultural issue) can lead to political fights over metrics (strategic issue) and result in choosing only easy, siloed measures (structural issue). Overcoming these hurdles requires a comprehensive approach, which many case studies have illustrated.

The Next article will present a number of case studies. 

References

[1] What are the key challenges in measuring and evaluating organizational performance? https://humansmart.com.mx/en/blogs/blog-what-are-the-key-challenges-in-measuring-and-evaluating-organizational-performance-57020 
[2] Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (1999). “Good Measurement Makes a Difference in Organizational Performance.”https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/measuring/good-measurement-makes-a-difference-in-organizational-performance/ 
[3] Examples & Success Stories, Balanced Scorecard Institute https://balancedscorecard.org/bsc-basics/examples-success-stories/ 
[4] Bain & Co. survey Ivey Business Journal (2004). “The Balanced Scorecard: To Adopt or Not to Adopt?” https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-balanced-scorecard-to-adopt-or-not-to-adopt 
[5] Balanced Scorecard: How Many Companies Use This Tool? https://bernardmarr.com/balanced-scorecard-how-many-companies-use-this-tool/ 
[6] WHY MEASUREMENT INITIATIVES FAIL EconBiz https://www.econbiz.de/Record/why-measurement-initiatives-fail-neely-andy/10014930511 
[7] PM'O'Phobia (or: the fear of performance measurement), Mark Hocknell | Customer Value. Business Results (WARNING website flags riskware so no link provided) 
[8] Stacey Barr (2013). “Why Don’t Companies Measure Performance?” StaceyBarr.com  https://www.staceybarr.com/measure-up/why-dont-companies-measure-performance/ 
[9] Why some performance measurement initiatives fail: Lessons from the change management literature https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247830890_Why_some_performance_measurement_initiatives_fail_Lessons_from_the_change_management_literature 
[10] KPI's & PuMP Archives, Page 3 of 4, Mark Hocknell | Customer Value. Business Results (WARNING website flags riskware so no link provided)

Disclaimer:

Please note that parts of this post were assisted by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool. The AI has been used to generate certain content and provide information synthesis. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the AI's contributions are based on its training data and algorithms and should be considered as supplementary information.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Briefing Note: Strategic Defence Review 2025 (Training and Simulation Focus)

This briefing note is on the recently published Strategic Defence Review (SDR 2025) with particular focus on training and simulation. Headlines : Strategic Defence Review 2025 mandates a fundamental overhaul of Defence pedagogy. NATO standards will now form the core benchmark; to ensuring interoperability. A philosophy of managed risk replaces “safety at all costs” culture, permitting experimentation before implementation and exploitation. A unified virtual environment and mandatory ‘synthetic wraps’ is aimed at transform training into a persistent, scalable activity independent of live platforms. Defence’s skills doctrine is focussed to promotes leadership, digital expertise and commercial acuity across regulars, reserves, civil servants as well as industry partners. Recruitment modernises through short form commitments and rapid induction camps. A whole force career education, training pathway underpins long term professional growth. Timeline obligations concentrate effort betwee...

Briefing Note: Spending Review 2025 (Defence Training and Simulation focus)

Date: 11/06/2025 This briefing note is on the recently published UK Government Spending Review (SR 2025) with particular focus on Defence Training and Simulation. It builds on the analysis of the Training and Simulation analysis of the Defence Spending Review 2025 that can be found at https://metier-solutions.blogspot.com/2025/06/briefing-note-strategic-defence-review.html Headlines: Table ‑ 1 ‑ 1 Big picture – how the June 2025 Spending Review (SR25) touches Defence Training & Simulation. IMPACT Analysis: Using the core factors of the #IMPACT theory [1] and data from 2024 as a baseline we can draw some strategic insights into the Defence Training and Simulation themes of SR 2025. Figure 0 ‑ 1 IMPACT-Factors shifts driven by SR25, top level IMPACT analysis of the training and simulation aspects of SDR 2025 Table 2 ‑ 1 comments on the effect of SR2025 and shows the effect on the main IMPACT Factors. Legend: ▲ positive shift, ▬ neutral. What changes for Defence training p...

Briefing Note: Competition & Markets Authority Investigation into Google’s General Search and Search Advertising Services

Date: 16 January 2025 Subject: Investigation into Google’s compliance under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 Purpose:  This briefing addresses the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA’s) investigation into Google’s general search and search advertising services. The investigation evaluates Google's compliance under the digital markets competition regime and assesses whether Google should be designated as having Strategic Market Status (SMS). If designated, specific Conduct Requirements and Pro-Competition Interventions could be imposed to enhance competition, innovation and consumer protection. Key Context Market Dominance: Google accounts for over 90% of the UK general search market, generating high revenues from search advertising. Its market share and control over key access points create significant barriers for competitors. Economic Impact: UK advertising spend on search has doubled between 2019 and 2023 to £15 billion, with Google dominating the ...