Skip to main content

Understanding Response Curves

The Response Curve is a visual representation of how organisations manage and recover from events and incidents, such as cybersecurity breaches, natural disasters or operational disruptions. It shows the progression of an event from the moment it occurs, through the response phases and eventually back to normal operations. The curve helps illustrate how preparedness and quick, effective responses can reduce the impact of an event.

The curve typically has four main phases:

  1. Incident Detection: This is the moment when an incident occurs or is first identified. The curve starts to rise as the problem grows. Detection may involve monitoring systems, user reports or automated alerts. The speed and accuracy of detecting an incident directly influence the organisation's ability to contain and manage it.
  2. Incident Response: After detection, the response phase begins. This involves classifying the severity of the incident, containing its effects and taking steps to stop its escalation (such as isolating affected systems or shutting down compromised areas). The goal here is to minimise the damage and prevent further spread. In this phase, the curve continues rising, representing the growing impact but effective response can slow the rise.
  3. Incident Recovery: Once the incident is contained, the focus shifts to recovery—restoring services, recovering data and returning to normal operations. The curve begins to descend as the impact lessens. The speed of recovery depends on factors like the severity of the incident and the readiness of backup systems. Effective recovery strategies bring operations back to normal more quickly and with fewer long-term effects.
  4. Return to Normal Operations (Norm): The final stage is when normal operations are restored and the incident is resolved. The curve reaches its baseline again. However, after every incident, a post-incident review should take place. This is the time to learn from the incident, identify any weaknesses in detection, response or recovery processes and implement improvements for future preparedness.

The supporting diagram of the Response Curve shows the phases of Detection, Response, Recovery and Return to Normal. It illustrates how the impact of an incident evolves over time, with a peak during the response and a gradual recovery. This visual should help clarify the concept.

Key Takeaways from the Response Curve

  • The faster you detect and respond, the lower the peak of the curve. Quick action can drastically reduce the damage and prevent the incident from spiralling out of control.
  • Preparedness matters. Organisations with strong preparation, such as clear policies, well-trained staff and robust monitoring systems, tend to flatten the curve earlier, meaning the impact of the incident is reduced.
  • Learning from incidents is crucial. Once an incident is resolved, the lessons learned can be used to improve incident management processes, making the organisation more resilient to future incidents.

The Importance of the Curve

Understanding the Response Curve helps organisations see how various phases of event or incident management work together to reduce the impact. The goal is to flatten and shorten the curve, meaning fewer disruptions and faster recovery times. An efficient response framework ensures that organisations can better handle incidents and emerge stronger, more prepared for future challenges.

Disclaimer:

Please note that parts of this post were assisted by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool. The AI has been used to generate certain content and provide information synthesis. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the AI's contributions are based on its training data and algorithms and should be considered as supplementary information.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of KYC and KYB: Efficiency Meets Accuracy

The landscape of Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) processes is rapidly evolving, driven by technological advancements and the increasing demand for more efficient and accurate compliance solutions. As we move into the future, several key trends have emerged, indicating a significant shift towards digital compliance and the integration of innovative technologies. Drawing insights from leading experts in the field, this post explores the future of KYC and KYB, emphasising the trends that are set to redefine these crucial processes. The Rise of Digital Identity Verification In an expert roundtable hosted by Sumsub in 2024, top KYC trends were discussed, highlighting the pivotal role of digital identity verification technologies. As traditional manual verification methods become increasingly untenable due to their time-consuming nature and potential for human error, digital solutions offer a more efficient alternative. These technologies leverage advanced algorithms...

Forging Future Forces: The Imperative for the Collective Training Transformation Programme (CTTP)

In an era defined by rapid technological advancements and shifting geopolitical landscapes, the nature of warfare has evolved dramatically. Traditional battlefields have expanded into cyber realms and urban environments, while threats have diversified from state actors to non-state entities wielding sophisticated digital arsenals. Against this backdrop, the United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence and its partners, has been working for decades lay the foundations, with programs such as Output 3f Training for Combat Readiness, Common Simulator Service ( CSS ), Future Family of Collective Training Capabilities ( FFCTC) (damn! that’s an old one) which turned into  DOT C before becoming NET-C and not for getting the ever-present FCAST! (have they actual finished that yet!) as response to prepare its armed forces for the complexities of modern and future combat: the Collective Training Transformation Programme (CTTP) the next in a protracted line of acronyms. CTTP has the potential...

Briefing Note: Competition & Markets Authority Investigation into Google’s General Search and Search Advertising Services

Date: 16 January 2025 Subject: Investigation into Google’s compliance under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 Purpose:  This briefing addresses the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA’s) investigation into Google’s general search and search advertising services. The investigation evaluates Google's compliance under the digital markets competition regime and assesses whether Google should be designated as having Strategic Market Status (SMS). If designated, specific Conduct Requirements and Pro-Competition Interventions could be imposed to enhance competition, innovation and consumer protection. Key Context Market Dominance: Google accounts for over 90% of the UK general search market, generating high revenues from search advertising. Its market share and control over key access points create significant barriers for competitors. Economic Impact: UK advertising spend on search has doubled between 2019 and 2023 to £15 billion, with Google dominating the ...